Conservation discussion: the case of evergreen encroachment in Sierras Chicas, Córdoba

Abstract

This paper proposes a Grounded Theory methodology to address the complexity of socio-environmental issues. The analysis and planning surrounding the invasion of the evergreen ligustrum (Ligustrum lucidum) in the Sierras Chicas region (Córdoba) is used as a case study. Since the notion of invasion cannot be conceived without its counterpart—conservation—the paper begins with a brief review of the main debates surrounding this concept. Subsequently, based on an empirical analysis of scientific articles, laws, and environmental ordinances, the scientific and legislative narratives related to the topic are brought into dialogue. The results show that scientific narratives tend to conceive conservation primarily as an environmental issue, while regulations adopt a more balanced approach, incorporating political and economic dimensions with greater relative weight. This comparison confirms the hypothesis that the meanings of conservation differ between the scientific narrative and legal regulations, generating tensions in their articulation with development. These tensions are difficult to reach consensus on unless they are explicitly recognized and addressed in the design of future interventions to combat the spread of evergreen trees in the Sierras of Córdoba.